Welcome to Our Community

Some features disabled for guests. Register Today.

LimpyCNC

Discussion in 'CNC Mills/Routers' started by Daid, Jul 25, 2018.

  1. Daid

    Daid Well-Known
    Builder

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2018
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    3
    Daid published a new build:

    Read more about this build...
     
  2. Mark Carew

    Mark Carew OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Resident Builder Project Maker Builder

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2,103
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    Hello @Daid welcome to OpenBuilds and thank you for sharing your build! This one looks like it will be a fun one. following! Also thank you for the awesome work on CURA!
     
  3. Daid

    Daid Well-Known
    Builder

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2018
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    3
    Replaced all the wooden v0.1 parts with v0.2 parts yesterday. The Z axis is more rigid now, as it has 6 wheels instead of 4. Preventing a lot of flex in the plywood plate in which they are attached.
    upload_2018-7-28_13-37-36.png
    Also I can tighten the X wheels on the aluminium extrusion now, as the eccentric spacers are now at the top. So that has also increased rigidity as well.


    Bad thing, I forgot to disconnect the power from the electronics while working on it, and the UI board touched the main board at the 24V power, frying the electronics. I won't be able to get a new one till Tuesday.
     
  4. Daid

    Daid Well-Known
    Builder

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2018
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    3
    Finally found some energy to do something again in this heat.

    Replaced the electronics, and did my first cut. Made a 100x100mm square. It came out 98x98mm, so something is off. Not sure if it's backlash, but that is most likely. Something not stiff enough causing backlash. Could just be belt tension, as I didn't tension those properly yet.
    My feedrate was also quite high compared to the spindle speed. Still getting used to the different world of milling compared to 3D printing.
     
  5. Giarc

    Giarc Master
    Builder

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    837
    Likes Received:
    397
    You may need to just calibrate the steps/mm. They are both off the same which makes sense if you are using the same belting and pulleys.
     
  6. Daid

    Daid Well-Known
    Builder

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2018
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    3
    Well, as I used motors, belts and pulleys from Ultimaker. I'm pretty sure I'm spot on with 160 steps/mm (400 steps per revolution motor, 16 microsteps, 20 tooth GT2 pulley, GT2 has a 2mm pitch, (400*16)/(20*2) = 160 )

    It looks like it's a buildup of play in various areas. The belts where not tight enough, with 1.5m belt, that gives quite some stretch potential (guess what, belts are usually not tight enough, GT2 apparently needs 70N applied to them, according to a hardware engineer at the office)
    The front and back of the X carriage where not tight enough together, so the front could move in relation to the back, this seems to be pretty big part of the play causing problems in both X and Y directions.

    There is also some play in the whole Y arm, not sure where it comes from yet. Or how large it is.

    So, need a better solution to tighten the belts. And tighten every screw in the machine.
     
  7. JustinTime

    JustinTime Master
    Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2013
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    29
    Daid, listen to Craig! He has experience and knows what he's saying! CALIBRATE your axie!!! Search how to calibrate a CNC and you may find that your 160 steps/mm is off. It may be that you'll have to adjust them to...I don't know...maybe 161.578 steps/mm (just an example!!!). It depends on your machine. Every machine is a little different. The 160 is just a starting point!!!
     
  8. Daid

    Daid Well-Known
    Builder

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2018
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    3
    :eek:
    I'm not sure how to respond to that. But let's start off by saying that you come across as needlessly aggressive.

    I also think you are wrong. A 2% difference isn't due to some tolerance difference. As the whole positioning comes from the belts, it's not like the steps/rev and tooths on the pulley will have some tolerance on it that effect total distance. Only linearity.
    And the belts won't show a difference of 2% (unless you have different belts then expected. MXL vs GT2 is about 2%) Sure, there is some difference in tolerances in those belts. But nothing near what I'm seeing.

    Just to extra prove my point, of the 20.000 Ultimaker2 produced with the same belts, we never had a single problem with X/Y movement distance. Without calibration. But I might measure to see if my cheap Chinese 1.5m belt is accurate compared to the official GT2 belts I have from Ultimaker.


    Finally, I can just feel the play in the X/Y direction with ease. And one side of the square has "bites" out of it indicating that the router bounced on that cut.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice