Welcome to Our Community

Some features disabled for guests. Register Today.

Core-V

Discussion in '3D printers' started by runninfarmer, Mar 25, 2015.

  1. runninfarmer

    runninfarmer Veteran
    Builder

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    43
  2. Tweakie

    Tweakie OpenBuilds Team
    Staff Member Moderator Builder

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2014
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    300
    A very solid looking build indeed :thumbsup:

    Tweakie.
     
  3. runninfarmer

    runninfarmer Veteran
    Builder

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    43
    Thanks Tweakie! I'm excited to start building
     
  4. Val Cocora

    Val Cocora Veteran
    Builder

    Joined:
    May 19, 2014
    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    27
    Hi Farmer, I believe 2 lead screws for the z axis are enough if you keep the building volume up to 500^3. However, if you plan to scale it up, you may want to consider using 4 screws for the z axis. I am currently building a 1.5 cubic meter 3d printer using openbuilds v-slots, and I found that using 4 lead screws for the z axis works wonders in terms of balance of the platform. Also, the larger the building volume, the bigger the screws might have to be. I use 4 pcs. Tr16x3 metric lead screws, approx. 1200 mm long, calculated to support a load of up to 250 kgs.
    Best regards,

    Val
     
  5. runninfarmer

    runninfarmer Veteran
    Builder

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    43
    That's a good point, and that's one of my main concerns. Are you using one motor with the 4 leadscrews? I may design a belt path for 4 screws with one motor, possibly 5:1 geared. I don't want the possibility of out of sync motors, though I could wire them in series.
     
  6. Val Cocora

    Val Cocora Veteran
    Builder

    Joined:
    May 19, 2014
    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    27
    I am using 4 nema23 motors, one for each screw, each motor rated at 425 oz.in. The reason I'm using a high holding torque is that I want the steppers to hold firm onto the screws, so as not to screw my vertical resolution, pun intended. They will be sync'd thru the controllers, to avoid out of sync. I am using the same nema23, 425 oz. in for the y axis (got two of them) but with a specially modified shaft of 6mm diameter, to accommodate two gt2, 17 teeth, pulleys.
    The only axis where I am using nema 17 (two of them) is the x-axis, because the only moving part there is my micron 3dp dual extruder, roughly 2 lbs, which should be more than enough for two nema17 steppers to handle.
    Be careful to avoid under-powering, or your motors might stall or skip. Hope that helps.
    Best regards,

    Val
     
  7. DocDawning

    Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2015
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    How's this build coming? I'm quite fond of the general layout you have here.
     
  8. runninfarmer

    runninfarmer Veteran
    Builder

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    43
    Hi DocDawning, thank you! My Samson build has replaced this one, So I'll refer you to that one. I may still pursue this type of build in the future.
     
  9. Selvakumaran

    Builder

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2015
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi,

    Any update on this build?
     
  10. runninfarmer

    runninfarmer Veteran
    Builder

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2015
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    43
    Hi Selvakumaran,

    I haven't pursed this built yet. I've mainly been working on my Samson build, which borrowed some features from Core-V.
     
  11. rmriggin

    rmriggin Well-Known
    Builder

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2017
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    1
    Of all the builds I have looked at so far this one has been the most compelling. Having full v-rails for everything and a very solid build platform and frame while using a minimal amount of stepper motors to keep it all in sync. Brilliant! I would like to build something along the same concept as this printer but I am not too concerned about having a huge build area. 300mmx300mmx300mm would be perfectly adequate for me. For some reason I just don't want to build anything that uses linear bearings for any of the axis.
     
    runninfarmer likes this.

Share This Page

  • About Us

    The OpenBuilds Team is dedicated helping you to Dream it - Build it - Share it! Collaborate on our forums and be sure to visit the Part Store for all your Maker needs.


    [email protected]

  • Like us on Facebook

  • Support Open Source FairShare Program!

    OpenBuilds FairShare Give Back Program provides resources to Open Source projects, developers and schools around the world. Invest in your future by helping others develop their future.

    Donate to Open Source