Welcome to Our Community

Some features disabled for guests. Register Today.

Stepper motor torque?

Discussion in '3D printers' started by JackSmith24, Sep 8, 2020.

  1. JackSmith24

    Builder

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2020
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi all,

    I'm looking to build a CoreXY, and really thinking of going with the LayerFused X301 design with its 300x300 heated bed. I've found a great deal on new stepper motors locally that are rated 40Ncm minimum - are those enough to support that bed using 8mm lead screws, 2mm pitch, single start?

    Thanks!

    Jack
     
    #1 JackSmith24, Sep 8, 2020
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2020
  2. Rob Taylor

    Rob Taylor Master
    Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Messages:
    1,470
    Likes Received:
    746
    Forty Newton-meters? You sure about that?!

    The NEMA 34 on my cast iron mill's Z axis is... twelve.
     
    JackSmith24 likes this.
  3. JackSmith24

    Builder

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2020
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0

    Oops! Mea culpa. .4 Nm . :)
     
  4. Rob Taylor

    Rob Taylor Master
    Builder

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Messages:
    1,470
    Likes Received:
    746
    Heh. That's what I suspected, but you never know. 141oz-in to the Nm, which puts your 0.4Nm around 60oz-in, which is right in the middle of the higher-end pack when it comes to NEMA 17s. Should do any normal sized print bed stage just fine, especially with true 2mm screws and not the standard 4-starts.

    If in doubt, you can Google "online leadscrew force calculator" and plug in the numbers to make sure- I'm sure it's tens of pounds of force though.
     
  5. JackSmith24

    Builder

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2020
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks Rob! I'll definitely look into the force calculator, but I figured it was really close to the 45 Ncm I've seen all over Amazon and that it was probably close enough. I just wanted some actual knowledge instead of my own assumptions!

    Thanks again,

    Jack

     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice